Search for: All records

To mitigate climate change, we must reduce carbon emissions from hyperscale cloud computing. We find that cloud compute servers cause the majority of emissions in a general-purpose cloud. Thus, we motivate designing carbon-efficient compute server SKUs, or GreenSKUs, using recently-available low-carbon server components. To this end, we design and build three GreenSKUs using low-carbon components, such as energy-efficient CPUs, reused old DRAM via CXL, and reused old SSDs. We detail several challenges that limit GreenSKUs, carbon savings at scale and may prevent their adoption by cloud providers. To address these challenges, we develop a novel methodology and associated framework, GSF (GreenSKU Framework), that enables a cloud provider to systematically evaluate a GreenSKU’s carbon savings at scale. We implement GSF within Microsoft Azure’s production constraints to evaluate our three GreenSKUs’ carbon savings. Using GSF, we show that our most carbon-efficient GreenSKU reduces emissions per core by 28% compared to currently-deployed cloud servers. When designing GreenSKUs to meet applications’ performance requirements, we reduce emissions by 15%. When incorporating overall data center overheads, our GreenSKU reduces Azure’s net cloud emissions by 8%. 

The growing demands for computational power in cloud computing have led to a significant increase in the deployment of high-performance servers. The growing power consumption of servers and the heat they produce is on track to outpace the capacity of conventional air cooling systems, necessitating more efficient cooling solutions such as liquid immersion cooling. The superior heat exchange capabilities of immersion cooling both eliminates the need for bulky heat sinks, fans, and air flow channels while also unlocking the potential go beyond conventional 2D blade servers to three-dimensional designs. In this work, we present a computational framework to explore designs of servers in three-dimensional space, specifically targeting the maximization of server density within immersion cooling tanks. Our tool is designed to handle a variety of physical and electrical server design constraints. We demonstrate our optimized designs can reduce server volume by 25--52% compared to traditional flat server designs. This increased density reduces land usage as well as the amount of liquid used for immersion, with significant reduction in the carbon emissions embodied in datacenter buildings. We further create physical prototypes to simulate dense server designs and perform real-world experiments in an immersion cooling tank demonstrating they operate at safe temperatures. This approach marks a critical step forward in sustainable and efficient datacenter management. 

Resource allocation problems in many computer systems can be formulated as mathematical optimization problems. However, finding exact solutions to these problems using off-the-shelf solvers is often intractable for large problem sizes with tight SLAs, leading system designers to rely on cheap, heuristic algorithms. We observe, however, that many allocation problems are granular: they consist of a large number of clients and resources, each client requests a small fraction of the total number of resources, and clients can interchangeably use different resources. For these problems, we propose an alternative approach that reuses the original optimization problem formulation and leads to better allocations than domain-specific heuristics. Our technique, Partitioned Optimization Problems (POP), randomly splits the problem into smaller problems (with a subset of the clients and resources in the system) and coalesces the resulting sub-allocations into a global allocation for all clients. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence as to why random partitioning works well. In our experiments, POP achieves allocations within 1.5% of the optimal with orders-of-magnitude improvements in runtime compared to existing systems for cluster scheduling, traffic engineering, and load balancing. 

Specialized accelerators such as GPUs, TPUs, FPGAs, and custom ASICs have been increasingly deployed to train deep learning models. These accelerators exhibit heterogeneous performance behavior across model architectures. Existing schedulers for clusters of accelerators, which are used to arbitrate these expensive training resources across many users, have shown how to optimize for various multi-job, multiuser objectives, like fairness and makespan. Unfortunately, existing schedulers largely do not consider performance heterogeneity. In this paper, we propose Gavel, a heterogeneity-aware scheduler that systematically generalizes a wide range of existing scheduling policies. Gavel expresses these policies as optimization problems and then systematically transforms these problems into heterogeneity-aware versions using an abstraction we call effective throughput. Gavel then uses a round-based scheduling mechanism to ensure jobs receive their ideal allocation given the target scheduling policy. Gavel’s heterogeneity-aware policies allow a heterogeneous cluster to sustain higher input load, and improve end objectives such as makespan and average job completion time by 1.4⇥ and 3.5⇥ compared to heterogeneity-agnostic policies. 

Cloud providers offer instances with similar compute capabilities (for example, instances with different generations of GPUs like K80s, P100s, V100s) across many regions, availability zones, and on-demand and spot markets, with prices governed independently by individual supplies and demands. In this paper, using machine learning model training as an example application, we explore the potential cost reductions possible by leveraging this cross-cloud instance market. We present quantitative results on how the prices of cloud instances change with time, and how total costs can be decreased by considering this dynamic pricing market. Our preliminary experiments show that a) the optimal instance choice for a model is dependent on both the objective (e.g., cost, time, or combination) and the model’s performance characteristics, b) the cost of moving training jobs between instances is cheap, c) jobs do not need to be preempted more frequently than once a day to leverage the benefits from spot instance price variations, and d) the cost of training a model can be decreased by as much as 3.5× compared to a static policy. We also look at contexts where users specify higherlevel objectives over collections of jobs, show examples of policies for these contexts, and discuss additional challenges involved in making these cost reductions viable.